Coronagate Part 2

“If you don’t do your own research, you won’t know the truth. If you don’t know the truth, you will believe a lie, and the lie you believe will be the lie you defend.”

I’ve been accumulating a lot of interesting data and had been adding to the first part of this series, but that thing was getting long, so I’ve decided to put what I’ve been finding together here in an effort to continue this conversation and dig for truth.

I just want to make clear my view of this situation from the start and say that in the past post and this one, I won’t be attributing motive. I am pointing to the facts, the science, the data, all of which are showing very clearly that this is not about a virus. It may have been in the beginning, but the facts simply do not support these drastic measures, and they haven’t supported them for quite some time. I’m pointing to the fact that this is more political, more control/fear driven, and more dishonest than anything I’ve ever seen, and it’s quite clear there is an agenda. What exactly that agenda is, I do not pretend to know and I have not tried to convince anyone of. The fact that they are going to try and vaccinate everyone is obvious. Beyond that, I don’t know what the future holds, and am simply trying to be prepared. I want to know the truth. The truth is important to me.

My original post was published on April 19th, I just want to start where I left off, and share some of what I’ve been finding.

The death rate is very important to me. Because the viral death rate high enough to shut down an economy should be firmly established for our future. It’s an important factor because if Covid-19 is our baseline, we also might need to shut down for influenza (0.13%), and we would definitely need to shut down for things like SARS (9.6%), and MERS (34.4%), where the death rate is astonishingly higher than the numbers being admitted now.

Do you know how easy it would be to twist this entire story into something along the lines of “there was this deadly virus that was going to kill millions of people, but the government stepped in and made everyone stay home and even though a lot of people died, and it was really horrible, millions of lives were saved, and people stayed home until scientists invented a vaccine and now we’re all saved because the vaccine prevents this virus from ever coming back, as long as everyone keeps getting it every year, and as long as we’re ready to stay home again anytime a new virus is discovered.”

Unless that’s the truth, I don’t want my children fed that lie. If you don’t see the danger in believing historical lies as truth, even just oversimplified medical stories, you should brush up on your smallpox and polio history. 😉 And that’s not even going into tyrannical/socialist history that we’re obviously forgetting completely.

And while we’re on the topic of vaccines being the savior of humanity, I wouldn’t put your faith in this one very much. Moderna’s CEO bailed completely right as the announcement was made that they were entering the race to manufacture one. It says a lot that he sold every single stock he owned and moved away from the company right before it had the potential to save the entire planet, doesn’t it? “If Moderna’s early-stage vaccine can one day prevent coronavirus infection and the company’s best days lay ahead, why are insiders selling?”

Death rate percentages are being lowered with every new study that is done:

“Based on the results of the first round of testing, the research team estimates that approximately 4.1% of the county’s adult population has an antibody to the virus. Adjusting this estimate for the statistical margin of error implies about 2.8% to 5.6% of the county’s adult population has an antibody to the virus — which translates to approximately 221,000 to 442,000 adults in the county who have been infected. That estimate is 28 TO 55 TIMES HIGHER than the 7,994 confirmed cases of COVID-19 reported to the county at the time of the study in early April.”[1] (this brings the death rate down to a tenth of what has been predicted: somewhere between 0.1 and 0.3%)

“Widespread antibody testing in a Californian county has revealed a much higher prevalence of coronavirus infection than official figures suggested. The findings also indicate that the virus is less deadly than current estimates of global case and death counts suggest.”[2] (study concludes a death rate of 0.1-0.2% and that the infection rate is at least 50 times higher than originally assumed.)

“The results indicate that confirmed case numbers understate the actual number of infections substantially; during rapid growth phases where the daily growth rate can reach or exceed 30%, as has been seen in many countries,the confirmed case numbers under-report actual infections by up to 50 TO 100-FOLD.”[3] (also concluding a death rate of 0.1-0.2%.)

The CDC has admitted the death rate as of now for Covid-19 is 0.26%. It is an estimated 0.4% in symptomatic individuals but they estimate that 35% of individuals are asymptomatic, so that math brings you to 0.26%. [4]

“The CDC does caution that the numbers are likely to change with new data, but considering we’ve gone from 3.4 percent to 2.0 percent to now 0.26 percent. The more data we get, the lower the numbers get. So, I’m thinking it might get even lower.” [5] (this article is short, and very good. It ends with this statement: “But, the bigger takeaway from this is that the early doomsday predictions about the coronavirus were all wrong. Everything that justified the lockdowns and the shutting down of our economy was wrong. We need to open this country back up.”

I just want to make a point about death rates and what the “acceptable rate” is. I think we’ve been duped into thinking that no one should die. That people don’t die from viruses every day all over the world. It seems to be the goal to do everything in our power to stamp out viruses and make them the enemy and pretend this is a perfect world where people should be able to live forever and all death is a tragedy. On the contrary, death is a part of life. Dying from a virus is not the worst way a person can die, and the truth of the matter is, people die by the thousands every day. Even here in the US.

Unnecessary death is what gets me. At the top of my list of unnecessary deaths that bother me right now, are the 250-440,000 deaths every year caused by medical error. [6] Or the millions of people who will be killed by this lockdown. [7]

Dying from a virus can also be unnecessary. That’s why I advocate for health. For actually taking responsibility for the foods we put in our bodies and for educating ourselves on nutrition and the vitamins and minerals our bodies crave and the brilliant good health that is perfectly attainable for anyone who cares enough to put in a little bit of effort (or maybe a lot of effort). I do not deny that this virus is dangerous and deadly for some. But health plays a huge role in how you will respond to it. Treatment also plays a role, and I’m still seeing doctors ignore the treatments that help the most.

Speaking of which, the FDA revoked the use of hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19, despite over 70 years of it being an established drug on the market being used for its designated use of treatment of malaria along with multiple off label uses, including rheumatoid arthritis and lupus; despite hundreds of doctors reporting 99% success rates when this drug is given early after onset of symptoms, even in patients with multiple comorbidities and a severe case. If it’s truly a dangerous drug, where has the FDA been the past 70 years, when it was being prescribed 5 million doses per year (actually more than that most years)? Instead of looking at the 200 some studies supporting the safety and efficacy of this drug, and listening to actual doctors having success with it, the WHO and FDA have decided to deny its use based on studies like this one which has now been retracted because it was so laughable it was almost obscene. For an example of how bad this study was, they had EKG results from hospitals in Africa where they don’t even have heart monitors. 😛

The FDA is basing their bias against this drug on studies like this one by WHO, and this one done in the UK, both of which are using “potentially lethal” doses of hydroxychloroquine instead of the normally prescribed amount. Both trials were giving this drug at 4 times the maximum dose for any medical condition. Read details on these trials and more evidence surrounding this topic here.

Why would such large doses be given? Why is this drug under so much attack when doctors all over the world are reporting it to be absolutely life saving? Didier Raoult has treated over 3,000 patients, with a death rate of 0.75% said, “Actually from all respiratory infections, it is probably the easiest to treat. There is really no reason to get excited.” He later said, “…if you do not prescribe hydroxychloroquine when the patient wants it, that should be grounds for malpractice.” Just for comparison, the death rate in the trials done by the WHO and others, using “lethal doses” is 34 times higher.

They’re killing people to prove a point. Change my mind.

But no one is talking about treatments that work or about health. The irony of watching the man in front of me at the grocery store the other day buy close to $40 worth of candy and junk food while he wore a mask to protect himself from a virus with a 99.8% survival rate was the perfect example of where we are as a country. But that’s exactly how we’re being told to protect ourselves. By doing all the things that suppress our immune systems and then putting our trust in products that actually cause even more harm to protect us.

Masks are worse than an inconvenience. Not only do they not work [8], they are dangerous. [9] The WHO says there is no need for healthy people to wear face masks, just days after the CDC told all Americans to cover their faces. [10] Y’all. If it’s science we’re following, shouldn’t our biggest health agencies be making the same recommendations? And if we’re not making these decisions and recommendations based on science, what are we following?

So the question begs to be asked. What is an “acceptable” death rate? In my last post, I used influenza as an example, because it has a death rate of 0.13% and up to 60,000 people die from it every year and we hadn’t been taking drastic measures to stop it (other than advertising the flu shot in every store and street corner and doctor’s office).

This time, I would like to use another example. What about the death rate of the intervention used to “protect” people from the flu? What is the death rate of the flu shot itself? One study showed a 0.5% death rate among those 65 years or older, and another study showed a 0.6% death rate. (Pages 6 and 7 of the fluzone pacakge insert.) It’s worth noting that this product is supposedly protecting them from a virus with a 0.13% kill rate, and their chance of dying increases exponentially with this vaccine according to the numbers on their own package insert. I’ve already covered how the flu shot makes you 4 times more likely to get non-influenza respiratory infections in part one, and how it has no proven efficacy of even preventing the flu here, so I won’t belabor this point, but it behooves us to recognize that there are acceptable death rates for pharmaceutical products that are actually higher than the death rate of this virus.

There has been some confusion on the death counts reported by the CDC within its own website. I discovered recently that there are two areas where the death count of Covid-19 are kept track of on the CDC website and the discrepancy is huge. On May 3rd when I checked both, the death count of this virus when you look at the actual numbers was 37,308 in the US. [11] (last counted on the 1st of that month). The death count according to their main page on this topic was a big and bold number: 64,283 [12] (last counted on the 2nd). I posted about it on facebook and got some pushback and was fact checked. Their explanation for this discrepancy was the statement below from the CDC website: “Data during this period are incomplete because of the lag in time between when the death occurred and when the death certificate is completed, submitted to NCHS and processed for reporting purposes. This delay can range from 1 week to 2 weeks or more, depending on the jurisdiction, age, and cause of death.” (it now says, “1 week to 8 weeks or more”)

I have many questions about this discrepancy, including the fact that the lag has now gotten much longer. Does it truly take that long for things to be processed and counted? It’s definitely possible, I suppose. But it does prompt some questions. If we’re going by the 2 week claim from back then, can close to 30,000 people have died in 2 weeks? Because that’s how big this discrepancy is. Almost half of the total deaths! And how do they come up with such a high number on the main page if the counts aren’t truly in? Are they estimating before they’re actually counting? Wouldn’t the lesser number be more accurate then? I’m honestly not sure what all this means, but I do find it interesting, worth noting, and possibly keeping in mind as we read headlines.

I’ve tried to make this clear. I’ve even written an entire post asking for grace and calling for unity here, and the response has not been encouraging. But convincing people on anything is not my responsibility. There’s a freedom in that. I will continue searching for and sharing truth. I will continue to resist the efforts to control and silence me. I’m sorry that people are unable to find the freedom to release me to God’s will as I asked them to do, but that is simply not my problem. It’s theirs.

So let’s again, go over the reasons I speak on these things. Simply put, these laws are killing people. That’s a big deal to me. It’s something I cannot ignore. But beyond that, the emotional and mental harm that will be done to future generations as our children go to school this fall with CDC recommendations that are so insane it’s hard to maintain any respect for them at all. Yesterday, the governor of VA went over what it’s going to look like for us here in the fall and the main goal is to keep children from being able to touch each other. At all. Masks are “strongly encouraged.” Sports are going to be a laughingstock. Social distancing will be maintained as much as possible which means if your school is close to capacity, your children won’t have normal hours and will go to school in shifts. Desks will be 6 feet apart. The children will be eating in their classrooms instead of the cafeteria. There will be no recess. It’s going to be an absolute nightmare for teachers and I wonder how many of them will last in this type of a devastating environment.

The irony right now of schools being so much more beneficial than homeschooling because “children need to be socialized.” 🙂

Look up the recommendations. Read this for a little perspective. And don’t believe the lie that “recommendations” aren’t a code word for “law”. The CDC also “recommends” vaccines, let’s not forget. Depending which way your state/school leans, they refuse to take your children unless you comply with that. They’re clever to call them recommendations when most people (especially schools) follow the CDC like it’s the Word of God.

And all this to the one segment of the population that doesn’t even have a hard time overcoming the virus. Healthy children are not at risk. But we’re going to wrap them in bubble wrap anyway. For as long as it takes to create a vaccine, presumably. Meanwhile, they don’t let nursing homes in some states deny covid positive patients from being admitted. Yes, you read that correctly. They’re forcing the disease into an area where the most vulnerable population will be exposed. Cuomo in NY has been called out on this and reversed the order, but not before over 5,000 elderly people died as a result. When confronted about this in a press conference he waived it off and said the nursing homes could have refused to take the patients.

They should have. Just saying. All those lives could possibly have been saved. But blindly following orders is in vogue these days, and one must not question or use critical thinking to actually save lives. That would simply be taking things too far.

At least I have some hope of accountability happening. [13] Not that I expect anyone to actually go to jail, but if this even gets some news coverage and people find out what happened, that would be good enough for me. Because Cuomo was not alone. 4 other governors did the same thing in PA, NJ, CA, and MI. The death toll in these nursing homes is estimated to be close to 60,000, [14] which is close to half of the toll from the entire pandemic here in the US, just to give you a glimpse of the devastation wreaked by panicking (or malicious) governors who made horrible decisions and were followed without question by hundreds of compliant nursing homes in their states.

The CDC also advises hospitals be allowed to remove your newborn if they suspect that you have the virus. [15] They do not have to present a positive test to do this.

We’ve been warning that contact tracing will lead to the removal of children from their homes, and it is happening. “Today in dependency court madness, LA County Dept. of Children and Family Services (DCFS) recommended that the court remove my client’s child from their physical custody after the parent tested positive for COVID-19. This is a non-offending parent. The judge ruled in favor of DCFS and detained. Let that sink in . . . DCFS is asking for children to [be] removed from their parents’ custody due to COVID-19 despite the parent making the appropriate arrangements for their child.” [16]

On May 13, the BMJ published a study showing that a“Staggering number of extra deaths in community not explained by Covid-19” 20,000 to be exact. [17] That’s double the amount of deaths caused by Covid. Can that be extrapolated into other countries and regions? Is it honestly okay to kill twice as many people with the “cure” as the disease you’re trying to slow down? Because once again this is not about saving lives. The lock down can only slow the spread. The same amount of people will still get it and die from it. Hearken back to the days when they were first talking about shutting down for 2 weeks to “flatten the curve”. It was about not overwhelming hospitals. And now that millions of healthcare employees are laid off and hospitals are struggling and losing tons of money, we’re still locked down. Still talking about “phases” and how to protect people; still mandating masks… It’s become this weird, unattainable goal that isn’t even based in reality.

AND IT IS KILLING PEOPLE.

This doctor talks about seeing a year’s worth of suicide attempts in the past 4 weeks alone. [18]

There are hundreds of scientists [19] against these measures. Calling this whole mess a “travesty”.

Over 600 doctors have gotten together and written an open letter to Trump asking him to end this “mass casualty incident”. [20]

The letter says, “We are alarmed at what appears to be the lack of consideration for the future health of our patients. The downstream health effects … are being massively under-estimated and under-reported. This is an order of magnitude error. The millions of casualties of a continued shutdown will be hiding in plain sight, but they will be called alcoholism, homelessness, suicide, heart attack, stroke, or kidney failure. In youths it will be called financial instability, unemployment, despair, drug addiction, poverty, and abuse.” [21]

Is all this death and suffering worth it? Do the lockdowns even slow the spread and work? How effective are they? Well, the results are in for Europe, and this is what they’re saying, “…there’s little correlation between the severity of a nation’s restrictions and whether it managed to curb excess fatalities…” [22]

And Italy, where they shut down so severely over the past few months is now having protests asking the government to resign, saying the coronavirus pandemic doesn’t exist. Y’all. That’s an insane conclusion to come to in the same country that was supposedly “devastated” with “hundreds dying every day” and claims that the entire country was being “destroyed by Covid”. Isn’t it? And yet, here we are:

“Hundreds of protesters wearing orange vests or jackets gathered in Rome on Tuesday, chanting “Liberta’!” (“Liberty!”) to protest the government’s handling of the coronavirus crisis and calling for it to resign.‘The pandemic does not exist, it’s total bulls—,’ Pappalardo told a rally in Bari on Sunday, Italian news agency ANSA reported. ‘The coronavirus is not lethal, it only kills the already sick over 80s. Enough with the lies and falsehoods, you have terrified the Italian people.’Similar demonstrations were seen in Milan and small rallies in other regional capitals at the weekend. Speaking to a crowd of orange-vested supporters on Tuesday in Rome’s Piazza del Popolo — many of whom were defying a government order to maintain social distancing and to wear masks in busy public spaces — Pappalardo made similar claims, alluding to a high-profile doctor who said this weekend that the virus “no longer exists clinically.” ‘Now virologists also say that this coronavirus is nonsense…'” [23]

This article was just published 2 days ago in the scientific journal Science Direct, and states, “Were the public health measures indeed causal, as is widely assumed, in halting the spread of the virus? The data do not seem to support this conclusion.” [24]

Contrast that with Sweden, who never shut down, has had no economic collapse, no increased death from drastic measures that don’t work, and they’ve peaked and are on the downside of cases and deaths from this virus. [25] Since they didn’t lock down, they don’t have to worry about a “second wave”. They’re done with it. The media would have you believe herd immunity is suddenly a “myth” (after touting it as the sole reason everyone must be vaccinated for years now) but a S Korean study (among other data) shows that people who have contracted it and recovered no longer transmit the disease. [26] That means herd immunity is very attainable and Sweden has probably already achieved it. And their death rate (as of today) is 0.10%, by the way. That’s lower than CDC estimates for here in the US, so you can ignore the doom and gloom articles claiming their death rate is “astronomical.”

So was all of this for nothing? And will we continue to pretend this is about a virus when all the latest data shows that it is not?

I do think that perhaps the most telling proof that this was not about a virus is the fact that health officials are publicly encouraging the BLM protests and riots when just a few weeks ago they were warning that any “large gathering” would cause the spread of the virus and was basically bludgeoning your Grandma. Here’s a list of health officials who have come out to publicly support the protests and some have even gone so far as to make a distinction between BLM protests and those protesting the lockdowns. [27] I’ll let you guess which one is the only one they condone and how we’re supposed to believe the virus can now somehow detect which group you’re in.

It’s amazing, how science works these days. It bends in such pliable ways to accommodate those who wield it.

***Editing to add here (on June 20, 2020) a (possibly short-lived) positive effect these lock downs have had. Many of us have predicted this would happen, but I never expected anyone to actually publish a paper on it. Well, someone did, and the findings are even more extreme than I expected. Looking at the data on overall mortality, they have discovered that across the US, the mortality of infants has made an extreme drop since March.

Here’s what the graph looks like when compared to previous years.

“But the pandemic experience has brought on a surprising effect on this expected death rate among children. Starting in early March, expected deaths began a sharp decline, from an expected level of around 700 deaths per week to well under 500 by mid-April and throughout May. (1) As untimely deaths spiked among the elderly in Manhattan nursing homes and in similar settings all over the country, something mysterious was saving the lives of children. As springtime in America came along with massive disruptions in family life amid near-universal lockdowns, roughly 30% fewer children died.

Was this a protective effect of school closures? Were teenagers getting themselves into risky situations at a lower rate? No. There was very little effect among school age children or adolescents. (3) Virtually the entire change came from infants. Somehow, the changing pattern of American life during the lockdowns has been saving the lives of hundreds of infants, over 200 per week.” [28]

Our predictions were that because of less well visits, we would see a drop in SIDS deaths. This data seems to prove it beyond any shadow of a doubt. Is it possible that vaccines are killing over 200 babies in the US every week all year long? That’s definitely a question we should all be asking.

I hope they do a follow up on this once well checks are back in running for a few months and we’ll see if this death rate soars as infants are “caught up.”

I will end with this as my stance on authority and our blind obedience to it. I have questions to those who push for blind obedience:

If we are to obey the laws of our land, should we not obey the highest law of this land first? The constitution is completely against the overreach of government telling us how and when to gather, of what to put on our faces, of how we run our churches, etc. None of this would stand up in a court of law if the highest law was the measure against what is going on here.
Can you show me a place in scripture that talks of obedience to governmental authority that doesn’t have the specific qualification that government is in place to “punish the evil doers and reward/praise those who do good”?
Where do you get the Scripture to back up blind obedience that ignores all consequences to your actions, takes no responsibility, asks no questions, and must be silent and compliant?

This simplistic view that “obey governors good, question anything bad” just hurts me. I don’t think Jesus would go along with laws that are killing millions of people and harming children. I don’t know exactly what he would do because I haven’t put him into a box yet, but the Jesus I know called out false authority every single time he encountered it. He was bold and fearless. He did it all in love and redemption. But he faced the truth. He wasn’t passive. I just want to be like him. I want to be useful and I want to align my soul with truth, even if that means putting up with some misunderstanding and anger from people I care about. And that’s where I will continue to stand. No matter what.

Informed Health

Coronagate Part 2

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Share this:

Like this:

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply